Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Last Updated: 01.07.2025 06:29

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

There are some books that just…suck!

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

Powerful solar telescope unveils ultra-fine magnetic 'curtains' on the sun's surface - Space

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

This Type of Fiber Could Have Weight Loss Benefits Similar to Ozempic - ScienceAlert

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

PC: Google

Changing one gene can restore some tissue regeneration to mice - Ars Technica

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

Entertainment.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

Microsoft’s New Windows 11 Start Menu Is Finally Worth Exploring

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

PC: Google

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

I dreamt my mother had died and I cried so much in my dream. What does it mean?

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

A surprising study found hints of biological activity on a distant planet. Now, scientists say there’s more to the story - Yahoo

PC: Google

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

What is the most craziest dream you ever had?

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

Netflix and chill is a thing:

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

My wife found I had been on Pornhub. She considers this adultery and wants a divorce. She hasn't touched me in over 6 years. What should I do?

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

PC: Google…my precious!

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

United says it will slash Newark fares to win back travelers after airport chaos - NJ.com

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

Can Donald Trump use the Alien Friends Act of 1798 to give ALL illegal immigrants an ultimatum: You have 1 month to leave America, after which you will be arrested and jailed for 3 years?

PC: Google

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

Never Too Late to Start Eating the MIND Diet That May Prevent Dementia: New Study of 90,000 Over Decades - Good News Network

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Have the ability to visualize:

Many if not most, are in this category.

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Actually have some literary skill:

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

PC: The Guardian

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.